I caught another press release from Disability Rights Wisconsin. This time it involves a bill that has passed the legislature. Bill 667 is all about protecting children with disabilities within Child Protection Services and investigations.

Once again, I have a bit of a bone to pick with this bill and DRW about the requirement to list whether a child involved in an abuse investigation has a disability. In my job, we want to be able to find data sources to show that services are effective. This bill collects data by requiring CPS to not only document whether a child has a disability but also identifying that disability within categories.

I agree that children and adults with disabilities a higher incidence of abuse from parents, guardians, and service providers. The plan is to develop collaborations with DHS. What is DHS going to do in county CPS investigations? I also agree that when it comes to non-verbal children, there should be a written process of procedures to follow to better assess the possibility of abuse.

But where is the self determination or self worth of the child when you require that their disabilities be disclosed? And then it ends up on a spreadsheet somewhere for the state to use to garner funding in the future, not the counties. Their mention of offering additional training means more money for universities that run professional development trainings which in turn helps the state department of safety and professional services (licensing).

Every morning I get Change.org petitions in my email. It’s a small act that can add up when it comes to sheer numbers of signatures. I also enjoy getting updates from the petitions I’ve signed.

Today I was shocked to see the petition headline. Apparently the VA is trying to deal with their stream of unattended veteran files by trying to cut down their existing client therapy hours. That isn’t a new thing for insurance providers. I’ve been in the process of becoming more informed on Wisconsin’s Medicaid. Behavioral treatment is billed now in thirty minute sections.

It seems that the VA’s hiring of thousands of additional mental health professionals has not assisted in the backlog of veterans needing services. The new attempt is to double case loads by cutting therapy sessions in half. Pair this with the fact that for many veterans, the travel time is more extensive than the therapy time.

What are we as civilians supposed to do? What are we as veteran’s families supposed to do? I don’t have the answers and I don’t have the slightest clue as to how to start advocating for these veterans.

https://www.change.org/p/don-t-skimp-on-our-veterans-mental-health-therapy

I write a lot about non-profits and community services. But I was thinking about transitional services this past week. In my volunteer group, everything outside of being a listener is directing people to transitional services.

I have researched a lot of information about Autism Spectrum Disorder and the behavioral treatments. And I see far too much focus on ABA therapy. The main issue is when clients have other issues that ABA is not programmed to deal with. Where are the transitional services? Youth and their families find themselves dealing with in-patient behavioral health and discharge planners are at at odds with the lack of transitional services available.

As I have written in a recent post, there are clinically trained and licensed professionals who prefer to use their experience working in services that are already being met by less clinically experienced professionals.

Communities will continue to deal with shortages of clinical professionals when they only want to work in the private sector using common methods that don’t offer special populations.

Today I discovered a collaboration between two youth mental health agencies. Both agencies fulfill needs in the community however, their collaboration doesn’t fulfill one of the biggest community needs that their collaboration and combined expertise could provide.

Their collaboration refuses to work with youth with autism spectrum disorder or severe emotional disorders. They were provided almost half a million in local community foundation dollars to start a day treatment program that expressly blocks many families from very needed resources.

I remember when one of the agencies was about to open, many community leaders applauded the ability that they would solve so many issues with adolescent mental health. I’ve had many conversations with the director over the phone and emails.

Like I said in my last post, we need to make agencies do more than just awareness campaigns. We need agencies and non-profits to actually fulfill some needs in the community. New programs and initiatives should be carefully analyzed before they are provided extensive community foundation resources. With the client criteria this collaboration works to serve, many other less clinically trained agencies and staff already fulfill the same need. What the community needs is more clinical practice professionals willing to fulfill clinical practice needs.

My next part in this series was going to be about police used as crisis response. But Disability Rights Wisconsin sent out this headline for a report on Restrictive Measures and Seclusion in the schools.

For me or the people I work with, this report is not surprising. Schools do actually have to report incidents where they use restrictive measures; the problem is the misunderstandings of what constitutes a restrictive measure. So the data is flawed because there is no standards taught to schools.

There was a similar report two years ago. Disability Rights Wisconsin wants to tout that they came up with recommendations to fix the issue. Did they follow up in any policy or political action pertaining to those recommendations? Clearly there is still a lack of proper education in the schools or trainings that would diminish the use of restrictive measures or seclusion.

When I was in elementary school, I used to walk the halls with my nurse and I saw teachers lying on top of students in the classroom doorways in an attempt to calm them down. Twenty five years later teachers either put them in an empty room or call the police school liason officer. The thing I suspect school staff have figured out is that having the liason officer deal with a student takes the burden off the school to follow state standards, the reporting process, and the liability issues. Police in many cases are allowed to use whatever means they see fit to take control of the situation. Also, while there are wonderful trainings and trainers out there doing crisis intervention, a majority of police departments have not utilized resources to meet the obviously increasing need for appropriate mental health response.

One school district’s idea of proper training for seclusion and RMs is to promise that you looked at a PowerPoint slide show located on the district’s website.

You want to know what I really want to know? Where are the school social workers? School psychologists? School counselors? I mean I hope that these professionals are doing more than assessments!

Restrictive Measures are necessary sometimes. Some people may want to argue with that but it’s a matter of personal safety. The problem is that RMs are being overly implemented and improperly used in schools so it creates an overall negative response. If done correctly, RMs become a last resort to preventing other circumstances such as inpatient psychiatric care or incarceration. We can certainly see how improper crisis responses have led to the deaths of many people.

In fact, just the other day I learned that a young man who was transgender had been killed by police in his parent’s home when they called police because he was threatening to kill himself. This young man was sick of a system and sick of professionals without proper knowledge that actually told him that he needed to cure his autism before he could start taking testosterone.

But I want to know how an advocacy organization which doesn’t get federal or state funding is not able to advocate for children and families? How can organizations not put in the effort on a local, state, and federal level in the areas of social policy and political change? If agencies employ attorneys and advocates then why are organizations mostly set up just to do awareness campaigns?

I mean come on! I filed a federal discrimination complaint against my graduate school because they discriminated against students with disabilities. I put myself on the ledge for what I believed was right. I graduated late but I can hold my head up high knowing I gave a damn about the area of study my degree is in.

Be an advocate.

http://www.disabilityrightswi.org/archives/5805